New perspectives on journal performance
Bibliometric indicators have brought great efficiency to research assessment, but not without controversy. Bibilometricians themselves have long warned against relying on a single measure to assess influence, while researchers have been crying out for transparency and choice. The incorporation of additional metrics into databases offers more options to everyone.
     
   
A question of prestige
Prestige measured by quantity of citations is one thing, but when it is based on the quality of those citations, you get a better sense of the real value of research to a community. Research Trends talks to Prof. Félix de Moya about SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), which ranks journals based on where their citations originate.
     
   
Sparking debate
Bibliometrics have become the way to rank journals, but each metric is calibrated to favor specific features. This means that using just one metric can only provide a limited perspective. Research Trends speaks to Prof. Henk Moed about how his new metric offers a context-based ranking to journals.
     
   
Bibliometrics comes of age
Almost 40 years ago when bibliometrics emerged as a field in its own right no one could have anticipated how developments in technology and research administration would push bibliometrics to center stage in research assessment. Research Trends asks Wolfgang Glänzel, of the Centre for R&D Monitoring ECOOM in Leuven, how he sees this remarkable “Perspective Shift”.
       
     
 
 

...that the world’s favorite search engine wouldn't exist without bibliometrics?

The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) metric and the related Eigenfactor trace their origins back to pioneering work by Gabriel Pinski and Francis Narin in the 1970s (1), and are, in this way, also related to Google’s PageRank algorithm, which powers the famous search engine. Using data on cross-citations between journals, they developed an iterative ranking method for measuring the influence of a journal based on who is citing it and how influential they are.

Although Pinski and Narin were able to apply this method to a small database of physics journals, technological limitations meant the method could not be easily used on larger sets of journals, and it was neglected by bibliometricians.

All this changed in the 1990s with the rapid growth of computing power and the internet. Users needed an effective way of navigating through the sea of online content to find the information they wanted. In developing the Google search engine to address this, Larry Page drew on Pinski and Narin’s research to design the PageRank algorithm that ranks the importance of a webpage based on how many links it receives and who these links come from (2).

The popularity of Google triggered a renewed interest in Pinski and Narin’s work in the bibliometrics field that led to the development of metrics such as SJR.

References:
(1) Pinski, G. and Narin, F. (1976) “Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics”, Information Processing and Management, 12:297-312.
(2) Brin, S. and Page L. (1998) “The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine”.

     
     

Editorial Board
Iris Kisjes | Gert-Jan Geraeds | Andrew Plume | Judith Kamalski | Sarah Huggett | Thomas Jones | Michelle Pirotta, The Write Company

Journal Metrics

SJR

SNIP

“Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals”, Henk Moed

“The SJR indicator: A new indicator of journals' scientific prestige”, Félix de Moya

Free journal-ranking tool enters citation market: Nature news and comment

 

ISSUE 14 DECEMBER 2009

ISSUE 13 OCTOBER 2009

ISSUE 12
JULY 2009

ISSUE 11 MAY 2009

ISSUE 10 MARCH 2009

ISSUE 9 JANUARY 2009

ISSUE 8
NOVEMBER 2008

ISSUE 7 SEPTEMBER 2008

ISSUE 6 JULY 2008


ISSUE 5 MAY 2008

ISSUE 4 MARCH 2008

ISSUE 3 JANUARY 2008

ISSUE 2 NOVEMBER 2007


ISSUE 1 SEPTEMBER 2007